Archives For How Shall We Live?

It’s a simple but counterintuitive finding.

As Cal Newport tells it in Deep Work, when University of Chicago colleagues Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and Reed Larson invented a psychological testing technique called the experience sampling method, they were eager to find out what kinds of activities truly gave people joy and fulfillment.

The experience sampling method involved giving test subjects a pager and then randomly paging the subjects during a day. When they were paged, the subjects were to immediately record what they were doing and what their feelings were. This method, as opposed to relying on test subjects to keep a diary on their own throughout a day, was found to be far more effective in prompting people to accurately document the connection between different kinds of activities and their state of mind.

Here is what Csikzentmihalyi wrote of their fundamental finding:

“The best moments usually occur when a person’s mind or body is stretched to its limits in a voluntary effort to accomplish something difficult and worthwhile.”

This prompted him to write the book Flow about that particular state of being. Flow I

Our instincts, of course, are to seek happiness and contentment in relaxation, fun, and doing as little as possible. There is, of course, nothing wrong with relaxing. We need downtime. Even the occasional binge watching of a TV series. Yet, being fully engaged in something – physical training, carrying out a challenging work project, figuring out a complex jigsaw puzzle – that pushes us and stretches us is actually an essential ingredient of a full life.

This, interestingly enough, is what the whole Christian life offers.

When, with God’s help, we commit ourselves to living out God’s love and purposes in all phases of our lives and the life of the world, we are immersed in something both challenging and worthwhile. This will translate into new consciousness of our choices and our habits every day of our life. It may mean taking on projects and challenges at a larger scale. These projects or challenges may well be way beyond what we believe we can handle with the skills and experience we’ve developed on our own.

This is what I believe the Jesus was talking about when he talked about the kingdom of God and the kingdom of heaven. He modeled it for us. Committing ourselves to it, paradoxically, can give us our best moments in life. Not necessarily easy. Or relaxing. But it can make us fully alive to who we should be.

This is what I would call the “kingdom flow.”

A great example is Bob Muzikowski. As he describes it, he was saved and made sober on the same day. When he subsequently moved to Chicago from New York to get away from reminders of his former drinking life, he started a little league on the city’s troubled Near West Side that attracted, to his amazement, 300 youth the very first time he put out notices about it.

His dive into a larger purpose did not end there. His professional life continued in the financial world until he began to talk deeply with Bob Buford and then joined the Halftime Institute when Buford launched it. In this process, Muzikowski found that he continued to be drawn to the needs of the communities he had experienced through the Near West Little League he had helped establish. So he gave up his comfortable financial career to convert an abandoned Catholic elementary school on the Near West side into the Chicago Hope Academy, a college and life preparatory high school with a strong Christian faith element. Muzikowski purposefully developed it to be more affordable for poor and minority youth than typical private high schools. He also recruits the best teachers he can find from around the country.

This has not been easy work.

“If I hadn’t had a Halftime journey, my life would have been easier and less stressful today,” Muzikowski says, “but it would definitely be a lot more shallow.”

Not everyone may feel the calling to do something that meaningful on that scale. But in every life I am convinced there are needs and purposes that God is offering us to be engaged with and choices to make every day. Responding will move us beyond our own interests and needs while tapping the talents and skills we have and even those we don’t know we have.

When we move from faith in God and what God offers to us through Jesus to a deep commitment to living with God’s purposes firmly in mind every moment, we go from getting to the starting line to actually running the race of which the Apostle Paul speaks in 1 Corinthians 9:23-25.

This is an essential point of what I mean by the phrase “whole faith.” When Jesus said he was the way, the truth, and the life, he was not pointing only to life after death. He was, as I understand it, pointing to a true life that begins when we synch our lives with God’s purposes. That true life begins in the here and now, and that God-filled life will never end. After death, it will be even more glorious and complete. This is the new and abundant life that Jesus promised. Being in this kingdom flow give us the sense of flow and challenging, immersive purpose that Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi described.

Our churches should help us understand this and develp the kingdom flow in our lives.

I know I need that help at times. The brokeness of the world, incuding the dysfunction of how we treat God’s earth, is at times overwhelming. When I don’t hear churches calling us to bring God’s kingdom into this world to the best degree possible, I am dismayed. I even find myself questioning my faith.

But when I come across Christians like Bob Muzikowski, my spirits rebounds, and my faith grows. I am encouraged, too, that there are growing numbers of Christians in the kingdom flow who are working in their own ways to change how we treat God’s earth in the process of growing food from it. Like Bob Muzikowski, they have taken on missions that are challenging and require of them tremendous sacrifice. Gabe Brown, Joel Salatin, and Ray Archuleta are just some of them.

The testimonies of their lives and the impacts of their lives say a great deal about what the whole Gospel offers to you and the world and about its truth beyond its words.

Have you found yourself coming to walk in the same paths as your parents without consciously choosing to do so?

My father has long treasured the book of Proverbs and has quoted his favorite verses as long as I can remember. As I recently made my way through Proverbs as part of my morning meditation and prayer routine, I found rich wisdom in it. It’s becoming one of my favorite books of the Bible.

The twenty-seventh chapter’s nineteenth verse has begun to put down particularly deep roots in me:

“As water reflects the face, so one’s life reflects the heart.”

What kind of heart are our lives reflecting?

The Bible refers to the heart a great deal. The word “heart” is referred to in the Bible, depending on the translation, easily over 500 times, according to Christian Bible Reference.

There are also many definitions of the heart as it is used in the Bible. I would suggest that it is a combination of one’s character, will, and emotions. It is the center of who we are.

Read the Bible carefully and you’ll see that the nature of people’s hearts is at the center of many stories.

When David reacts in anger to Nathan’s story of the rich man who has stolen and then cooked a poor family’s beloved lamb, it is David’s heart that is on display. When the story leads David to then confess his own sin of adultery with Bathsheba, it is David’s heart that has been moved. And the fact that his heart would respond to the crushing realization of what he had done in the context of God’s moral framework is one of the reasons we sympathize with David. Our hearts resonate with his heart.

As you read the Gospels, I believe you’ll find that Jesus is sympathetic or antagonistic to people depending on the orientation of their hearts.

People who are humble and who recognize their own failings or whose hearts are full of adoration for God receive his kind attention.  On the other hand, Jesus jolted people who had allowed their hearts to become cold and selfish. People who had become bound up in preserving institutional power or in pursuing purity without being balanced by mercy find themselves exposed to Jesus’ anger and criticism.

Jesus models for us the hearts we should have – full of love but also tenacious and passionately committed to God’s will and kingdom and intentions for this world.

In his book Renovation of the Heart: Putting on the Character of Christ, Dallas Willard wrote a profound statement about Jesus:

“The revolution of Jesus is in the first place and continuously a revolution of the human heart or spirit. It did not and does not proceed by means of the formation of social institutions and laws, the outer forms of our existence, intending that these would then impose a good order of life upon people who come under their power. Rather, his is a revolution of character, which proceeds by changing people from the inside through ongoing personal relationship to God in Christ and to one another. It is one that changes their ideas, beliefs, feelings, and habits of choice, as well as their bodily tendencies and social relations. It penetrates to the deepest layers of their soul.”

Much of my life I have heard little of this from churches I have attended as there is a focuse on holding true to correct doctrines on grace, sin, the Trinity, and other topics. But there is little or no attention given to encouraging members to honestly and carefully examine the state of their hearts and to helping them deliberately open their hearts to transformation by God.

I am 100% convinced that a whole Christian faith must also be rooted in what Dallas Willard calls the revolution of the heart. A whole faith church would be intentional about this in its worship, instruction, and culture.

If Jesus is renovating, remaking, and revolutionizing our hearts, then our lives could not help but reflect that. And not just the lives we live in public, but all the spheres of our lives. At home. With our families. With our friends. On business trips. In our politics. On the Internet.

And, without doubt, in our relationship with the life of God’s earth.

How could it be otherwise?

How can one be loving, compassionate, patient, and possessing of self-control and yet deliberately and unnecessarily maim the land, water, and living things around us? How can one be fiercely, self-sacrificingly loyal to God’s desire for how all of life should be in this world and go along with systems and culture that methodically destroy what God has given us to carefully shepherd?

More than in any other area of our lives, we have put blinders on our hearts when it comes to our relationship with non-human life around us.

Our human tendency, of course, is to resort to rationalization when there is an aspect of our life in which we do not live by the values to which we say we are committed with our hearts and minds. This is easier to do when the mainstream culture and even the mainstream church culture around us accept and even promote those rationalizations.

But God wants our whole life, our whole heart.

And when you open yourself to God’s love and God’s spirit, your heart will begin to be remade and your life cannot help but show it.

Every corner of your life.

What kind of heart is your life reflecting?

What kind of heart is the corner of God’s living earth that you are impacting with your life reflecting?

Saving Snakes

Nathan Aaberg —  April 30, 2016 — 2 Comments

This week the environmentally-oriented charter school my younger son attends held a fair at which eighth graders shared information about the culminating projects they had been required to complete before they could graduate.

My son and his classmate had an unusual project on which to report. They had built, with the substantial help of the local township open space district and a local herpetologist, a snake hibernaculum at a local nature preserve.

2015-12-09 12.46.51

Hibernaculum is a fancy scientific word for a snake den that allows snakes to safely survive the winter. To survive winter’s cold, snakes need to get to find places where the temperature stays above freezing. Some smaller snakes can use the holes of crayfish to get below the frost line. Some seek out animal burrows or even holes in the ground formed by rock formations and fallen trees whose roots have rotted away.

As we have filled up the landscape with buildings and roads, however, we’ve created smaller and smaller islands of habitat. Each small island is much less likely to have natural overwintering sites of its own. And because snakes can’t fly, the snakes will usually end up dead and flat if they try moving from their island to another in search of shelter from the winter.

In other words, snakes need help. Snakes need saving.

The basic concept of man-made structures to help nature out isn’t new. People have been doing this kind of thing with bluebird houses for many decades. Without man-made bluebird houses to provide the cavities bluebirds need for creating nests and without the monitoring needed to keep out violently aggressive European starlings and house sparrows, we’d have very few of those beautiful birds around.

The success of blue bird boxes tells us something profound. It tells us that we can have the will and the ability to be Good Samaritans for other members of God’s Creation.

But are we willing to do that for snakes?

For many of us, they fill us with unease or worse. In fact, snakes have been persecuted for far too long, far too festively, and far too often by Christians who should know better. But snakes have a beauty all their own (Proverbs 30:19) and ecological value, too.

Seeing Creation as God would have us see it rather than through the prism of human culture is one important way that Christians can truly be the salt of the earth. That means we should see value in birds that add bright flashes of blue to our landscape and in other creatures.

The hibernacula created by my son, his classmate, and the local township staff was an all-day affair that required heavy-duty equipment. By the afternoon, our arms were dead tired as we shoveled dirt back into the larger hole in which the main chamber of the hibernacula had been constructed with drain tile pipes, portions of PVC tubes, as well as large and small stones. We created small mounds of stones to camouflage and protect the two entryways as well.

2015-12-09 14.16.40

There was a certain tiredness and even doubt in my heart as well.

Was all of this work going to make a difference? Unlike the construction of bluebird boxes, we didn’t know at the end of the day whether the hibernaculum would ultimately be successful. The art and science of snake hibernaculum construction are still very young.

Yet, it felt good to do something. I was proud of my son and his friend for pushing this project through a number of obstacles to completion. And I was profoundly grateful to the staff ot the local township and to the herpetologist whom all responded so enthusiastically and helpfully when the boys contacted them.

As I’ve thought further about that day, I also believe we were answering a fundamental calling. We’re called to use all of the creativity and ingenuity we’ve been blessed with to care for and to mend our Father’s world. We’re all called to be good shepherds.

Even when it’s hard and challenging.

Even when there is no guarantee of success.

Even when snakes need the shepherding.

 

P.S. The local herpetologist who helped the boys shared with us the story of an unusual hibernaculum. Some years ago western fox snakes at a local natural area had begun using the hollow cinder block walls of the basement of a nearby home as a place to survive the winters. When the landlords of this rundown building contacted him, he was able to begin implanting little passive transponders in each one. This allowed him to monitor when each individual snake came into the basement during the fall and when it departed in the spring. At the peak, there were over one hundred snakes in the basement.

One of the tenants had been an elderly woman who lived there by herself. When the occasional fox snake, which is not a poisonous species, would find its way upstairs and even into her bathtub, she didn’t panic. Instead, she would call her son, and he would drive over and bring the snake safely back down into the basement.

 

 

 

A friend recently spoke highly of a church in our area that we were not familiar with. When I went to their attractive web site and looked at their statement of beliefs, I was surprised that I was not surprised when I could not find one word that referred to the ongoing importance of God’s earth to God or humanity’s responsibility to steward it.

Not one word.

It’s as if the world around us doesn’t exist, and God’s matter does not matter.

This absence, much less the belief of some Christians that the world is ours to plunder, has provoked me to anger and frustration in the past. And, if I am honest, I must admit there are still some stirrings of those emotions in my heart as I write this even now. But I have had to ask myself: “How can you continue to be surprised when you have clearly seen that the absence of a lively and thoughtful concern for God’s Creation is the norm among churches and Christians? And what does anger and criticism, unaccompanied by tangible impact, accomplish?”

I’ve come to realize that I need to move forward in a different way. I hope you’ll bear with me as I try to explain where I believe I need to go.

Let’s start with realities.

Reality #1: The DNA of almost all churches, the mix of their fundamental beliefs and culture, does not include God’s earth in any meaningful way. In Psalms 36:6, we read: “Your righteousness is like the highest mountains, your justice is like the great deep. You, Lord, preserve both people and animals.” Do Christians and churches hunger for a righteousness that includes animals and the condition of Creation? No.

Reality #2: Christians who are convinced that a whole life of Christian love must include thoughtful and even sacrificial stewardship of God’s earth tend to be small minorities in churches. They often face scrutiny and questions. They are not free to fully express a whole Christian life. They do not have the impact they could if they united their energies and resources with other Christians with the same convictions.

Reality #3: I would assert, too, that the Christians and Christian groups that I see out there who speak out about the imperative to care for God’s earth are generally not strong enough and ambitious enough in their message. With all due respect for their ideals and efforts, they seem too concerned about not offending anyone and staying carefully within the bounds of mainstream Christian history and culture. They hope that gradual, incremental changes by individuals and churches will somehow make a difference over time. There is a place for that, but they do not ask enough of their fellow Christians. The scale of their efforts and ideas are not matching the scale of the problem.

Reality #4: Year after year, decade after decade, century after century God’s earth finds itself, on the whole, in retreat and in chaos and under assault. Creatures have disappeared and are disappearing from the face of the planet. Human activity is throwing our very climate into chaos. And too often Christians are not part of the brave, enterprising efforts being made by people around the globe to protect, renew, and restore God’s earth.

Looking at this reality, I’ve come to two conclusions.

First, while there is a role for criticism and speaking up prophetically, I believe it is less than productive to spend too much time in anger. I won’t deny my frustration and despair but I am going to do my best not to dwell on them or dwell in them. My plan is to engage in strong criticism only when it is strategic.

Second, I will use my frustration and the strong sense that the Church has missed something fundamental as motivation to pour the energies and time I have left to do what I can to bear positive fruit. I will do what I can tangibly to play a role in renewing God’s earth in practical, tangible ways. I will also do what I can to support and engage other Christians in doing tangible things.

I’m blessed to have the opportunity in my day job to do work to advance sustainable agriculture and land conservation. I will do my best in that work.

Another practical fruit I’d like to bring forth is fellowship for Christians who are committed to earth stewardship and who are actively carrying it out in their lives. As I mentioned earlier, Christians who care about God’s earth in a passionate way are often a minority in the churches to which they belong. I want to connect them with others so that we all be inspired and our convictions reinvigorated. Ideally, this fellowship would also lead to pooling of energies and resources that lead to organized action that would have far more impact than we are having individually.

Along those lines, I am also intrigued by the idea of pooling Christian giving to support large-scale and small-scale efforts to steward Creation well. Most Christian giving goes to churches, education, and social services. These are all vitally important. But living up to our fundamental responsibility to keep the earth should be generously and sacrificially supported as well.

My hunch is that much good could come from launching a foundation that would be a catalyst for expanded Christian giving in this area and that could also help Christians better understand where their giving could make the most difference.

This next idea might seem out of place in this list of actions but I don’t think it is. I feel pulled in the direction of creating stories. Over the past years a number of ideas for stories that would imaginatively and provocatively explore what a whole Christian faith would look like and what fruit it would bear have come to me. Of course, nothing seems less tied to real-world impact than retreating to a room to type words in a story (or blog post) that may never be read. Yet, stories are at the core of what means to be human. We interpret our lives as stories. Stories can inspire us. Stories can challenge us as Jesus’ parables did. They can cast new light on our view of reality as the story Nathan told David did. I would love to add to our compelling stories, in both books and film, of Christians tenaciously and creatively renewing God’s earth to the best of their abilities.

Finally, and this may be the most challenging of ideas, I believe Christians should be pioneers in creating local experiments in culture and economy that express a whole faith. The Amish and the desert fathers and their monasteries are examples to learn from. I dream of being part of a Christian community that is tied to a particular piece of land in a deep relationship of restoration, renewal, and productive use. There would be habitat. There would be farming. There would be green burials. There would be music, teaching, social gatherings, and a vibrant model for a whole Christian faith expressed in a whole Christian life of community.

As for this blog, I will use it for sharing news and lessons and insights from these directions I am taking while occasionally taking it on other directions as well. I will also use it for profiling and learning from Christians and non-Christians about how to care for God’s earth.

Interestingly enough, I’ve recently come across two passages from two very different sources that share this theme of a call for action.

In Restoration Agriculture, Mark Shepard calls for a new kind of agriculture that integrates perennial plants and domestic animals in ways that build soil, create habitat, and offer abundant food in the form of fruits, nuts, mushrooms, and meat. In his last chapter he calls for action and says way too much time and energy is spent in writing blogs (!) and books. Here’s one section:

“If after reading this book you decide not to implement at least some of the strategies in it, you might as well dig a hole, toss the book in it, then plant a hickory tree. The book will at least have done some good. Better yet, give this book to someone who will actually do something.”

And in the Gospel of Matthew Jesus says:

 “Therefore everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock. The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house; yet it did not fall, because it had its foundation on the rock. But everyone who hears these words of mine and does not put them into practice is like a foolish man who built his house on sand. The rain came down, the streams rose, and the winds blew and beat against that house, and it fell with a great crash.”

Both of those messages shake me. They rattle my cage where I too often find myself sitting and deliberating on exactly what are the right and proper things to believe. The key word is “sitting.” I am too often sitting with deeds and actions left undone.

I know my convictions and I believe you know yours, too. They need to take root in particular places and in specific actions.

Let our rooting begin.

You know you’re dealing with culture when you feel things should be done a certain way and you can’t really explain why.

Some cultural expressions, like the contrast between the American handshake and the Japanese bow or the cheese heads worn by Green Bay Packers fans, are innocuous and simply add flavor to life. Others enshrine fear and perpetuate human brokenness.

The parable of the Good Samaritan challenged the culture and norms of Jesus’ day. In the parable, love won out over a deep-seated and destructive cultural divide.

The good Samaritan: Love over culture.

The good Samaritan: Love of God over culture.

It is up to Christians to be discerning about culture. And if a cultural element contradicts the loving heart that God desires us to have, that cultural element must go.

But because culture is so powerful and because we breathe it and swim in it everyday, we almost always have blind spots.

That’s true with cultural traditions that shape how we relate with other people. It’s particularly true with cultural traditions that dictate how we relate to God’s earth. The non-human living things of this world are, as a whole, the ultimate “other.” Our survival depends on us consuming nature. What’s more, the greater the scale to which we desire to expand our personal comfort and our civilization’s power, the greater the scale to which we feel compelled to use God’s world in ways that deplete and diminish it. This approach to God’s world becomes rationalized and embedded in our culture. And then we can’t see the reality of what is being done.

The church should be different.

The church should be a place where God and God’s love prevails over any cultural expression that is counter to God’s love and the way God desires us to live.

What would a Christian approach to church landscaping look like if you were starting from scratch? I’d suggest these principles:

Meet the needs of people who work, worship, and play there.

Seek to be efficient in the use of resources and time.

Be a good neighbor in every way.

Express the creativity that God has blessed people with.

Affirm the beauty of God’s earth in all its diversity and life.

Steward God’s earth faithfully in the unique context of that place.  

Achieve all six of the previous principles to the best degree possible.

So how does the typical church’s big, green, weedless lawn match with those landscaping principles?

Devoting areas of the church’s ground to lawn to enable games and social activities does meet the needs of people. And there is a certain simplicity and efficiency to managing a property with just one type of landscape. The neat lawn can also be seen as being a good neighbor in terms of respecting landscaping norms of an area.

So you can make some case for the church lawn in terms of the first three principles.

But you begin to run into trouble as you think more broadly about what it means to be a good neighbor and as you look at the remaining principles.

When the lawn’s maintenance uses up large amounts of locally scarce resources (like water in dry areas like California) and applies herbicides, pesticides, and fertilizers that contribute to broader environmental problems that impact people as well as wildlife, we are not being good neighbors. Nor are we being good neighbors when our lawnmowers emit pollution. We are losing, too, the opportunity to grow food that could feed our neighbors who lack good food to eat.

And is it just me or does a landscape with just a lawn lack any display of artfulness?

Sadly, and especially when there is grass even in places where people will never venture, the lawn-dominated church landscape does not affirm the goodness of God’s Creation. It communicates that the only plant God loves in Creation is Kentucky bluegrass. (Check out, by the way, this imaginary dialogue between St. Francis and God on the oddities of the lawn and how it makes no room for the many other flowers and plants of God’s Creation.)

It’s worse than that. Lawns provide almost no food, habitat, or shelter for wildlife at a time when the world is increasingly hostile to them.

So when our church landscape is a green empire of Kentucky bluegrass and non-native trees and shrubs, we think only of our own needs. We are depriving birds, butterflies, bees, and other members of God’s creation of the food, habitat, and shelter they need to survive, even in places we will not use. In no way can that be called stewardship of God’s earth.

When we come to the principle of optimizing, it’s become clear that we’ve maximized the first two principles and been a good neighbor in terms of cultural expectations. But in the process we’ve missed the broader meaning of being a good neighbor and completely whiffed on the other principles.

In other words, the typical church landscape tells the passing world that the Christian faith and that particular church care about human needs, efficiency, and meeting cultural expectation but don’t care about their neighbors in a broader sense and don’t care about the life of God’s earth. The typical church landscape ultimately communicates that we desire the assurance of life everlasting with God but we don’t want to be any more transformed and distinct from the culture around us than we must be.

But wait a minute, you say. What am I saying about my faith? I have a big, green, weedless lawn.

Well, actually, much of America does. According to this article, the lawn is now the single largest “crop” we grow. The United States has 63,000 square miles of lawn, which is approximately the size of Texas. That is a lot of water, a lot of chemicals and fertilizers, a lot of lawnmower pollution, a lot of unused potential for growing food, and a great deal of land made hostile to wildlife.

That does not square with the loving God of all of life we see in the Bible. The God who declared the whole ecological whole of creation, including humanity, very good. Who knows every bird on the mountains. Who feeds the ravens. Who shows great concern for the poor and weak. Who demonstrated dominion over the world by sending Jesus into the world. Who showers us, despite the fact that we don’t deserve it, with love and grace.

Church Lawn Image

Does typical chuch landscaping communicate fidelity to God or to culture?

But the gravity of human culture is so strong.

We expect lawn. We don’t know why, but we expect it.

Yet, from the very beginning, Christianity in its purest form has been a counter-cultural, self-sacrificing force against dominant cultural norms that were counter to love and compassion. This was because Christians who stood up to those cultural norms had hearts that had been transformed by Jesus.

It’s time to filter our whole culture, including our landscaping culture, through God rather than filtering God through our culture.

It’s time that churches thoughtfully use their website, their church signs, and their landscaping to communicate their values and their ultimate loyalties.

(In a future post, I’ll share helpful ideas and resources on Creation-friendly landscaping. Please share with me examples you know of churches being good stewards of their landscapes by email at wholefaithlivingearth@gmail.com.)